EJH para comentar/recomendar/criticar series sin hilo propio

[M. Corleone]

¿Alguien ha catado "City on a hill"?



Tiene muy buena pinta.

[¿Quien es este tipo?]

El nivel es bastante menor que el de las dos anteriores pero a mi no me pareció mala para nada, tal vez porque la vi sin comerme la cabeza buscando temas de NWO.

Pues si rememoras, vienes y me dices si estoy en lo cierto o no.

Pero vamos, solo con la puta insistencia que tienen, como el feminismo, de relacionar pornografía con aumento de violaciones pese a que los estudios afirman lo contrario ya da para encender las alarmas.

[M. Corleone]

relacionar pornografía con aumento de violaciones pese a que los estudios afirman lo contrario ya da para encender las alarmas.

Por ahí si que no paso.

[¿Quien es este tipo?]

relacionar pornografía con aumento de violaciones pese a que los estudios afirman lo contrario ya da para encender las alarmas.

Por ahí si que no paso.

No pases.

In a previous post, I summarized a half-dozen recent studies showing that all over the world—in the U.S., Denmark, Japan, China, Hong Kong, and the Czech Republic—as pornography became more easily available because of legislative changes or the arrival of the Internet, rates of sexual assault dropped consistently and significantly. As a result, I concluded: More porn, less rape.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/hk/blog ... ted?page=1

The effects of pornography, whether violent or non-violent, on sexual aggression have been debated fordecades. The current review examines evidence about the influence of pornography on sexual aggression incorrelational and experimental studies and in real world violent crime data. Evidence for a causalrelationship between exposure to pornography and sexual aggression is slim and may, at certain times, havebeen exaggerated by politicians, pressure groups and some social scientists. Some of the debate has focusedon violent pornography, but evidence of any negative effects is inconsistent, and violent pornography iscomparatively rare in the real world. Victimization rates for rape in the United States demonstrate an inverserelationship between pornography consumption and rape rates. Data from other nations have suggestedsimilar relationships. Although these data cannot be used to determine that pornography has a catharticeffect on rape behavior, combined with the weak evidence in support of negative causal hypotheses from thescientific literature, it is concluded that it is time to discard the hypothesis that pornography contributes toincreased sexual assault behavior.

http://christopherjferguson.com/pornography.pdf

The incidence of rape in the United States has declined 85% in the past 25 years while access to pornography has become freely available to teenagers and adults. The Nixon and Reagan Commissions tried to show that exposure to pornographic materials produced social violence. The reverse may be true: that pornography has reduced social violence.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm ... _id=913013

In this study, we examined the unique contribution of pornography consumption to the longitudinal prediction of criminal recidivism in a sample of 341 child molesters. We specifically tested the hypothesis, based on predictions informed by the confluence model of sexual aggression that pornography will be a risk factor for recidivism only for those individuals classified as relatively high risk for re‐offending. Pornography use (frequency and type) was assessed through self‐report and recidivism was measured using data from a national database from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Indices of recidivism, which were assessed up to 15 years after release, included an overall criminal recidivism index, as well as subcategories focusing on violent (including sexual) recidivism and sexual recidivism alone. Results for both frequency and type of pornography use were generally consistent with our predictions.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs ... 2/ab.20250

No correlations were found between the number of videos a man had rented and his attitudes toward feminism and rape. These findings suggest that calloused attitudes toward women may not be generated by sexually explicit videos but are more deeply ingrained in our society.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3813560?se ... b_contents

[M. Corleone]

relacionar pornografía con aumento de violaciones pese a que los estudios afirman lo contrario ya da para encender las alarmas.

Por ahí si que no paso.

No pases.

In a previous post, I summarized a half-dozen recent studies showing that all over the world—in the U.S., Denmark, Japan, China, Hong Kong, and the Czech Republic—as pornography became more easily available because of legislative changes or the arrival of the Internet, rates of sexual assault dropped consistently and significantly. As a result, I concluded: More porn, less rape.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/hk/blog ... ted?page=1

The effects of pornography, whether violent or non-violent, on sexual aggression have been debated fordecades. The current review examines evidence about the influence of pornography on sexual aggression incorrelational and experimental studies and in real world violent crime data. Evidence for a causalrelationship between exposure to pornography and sexual aggression is slim and may, at certain times, havebeen exaggerated by politicians, pressure groups and some social scientists. Some of the debate has focusedon violent pornography, but evidence of any negative effects is inconsistent, and violent pornography iscomparatively rare in the real world. Victimization rates for rape in the United States demonstrate an inverserelationship between pornography consumption and rape rates. Data from other nations have suggestedsimilar relationships. Although these data cannot be used to determine that pornography has a catharticeffect on rape behavior, combined with the weak evidence in support of negative causal hypotheses from thescientific literature, it is concluded that it is time to discard the hypothesis that pornography contributes toincreased sexual assault behavior.

http://christopherjferguson.com/pornography.pdf

The incidence of rape in the United States has declined 85% in the past 25 years while access to pornography has become freely available to teenagers and adults. The Nixon and Reagan Commissions tried to show that exposure to pornographic materials produced social violence. The reverse may be true: that pornography has reduced social violence.

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm ... _id=913013

In this study, we examined the unique contribution of pornography consumption to the longitudinal prediction of criminal recidivism in a sample of 341 child molesters. We specifically tested the hypothesis, based on predictions informed by the confluence model of sexual aggression that pornography will be a risk factor for recidivism only for those individuals classified as relatively high risk for re‐offending. Pornography use (frequency and type) was assessed through self‐report and recidivism was measured using data from a national database from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Indices of recidivism, which were assessed up to 15 years after release, included an overall criminal recidivism index, as well as subcategories focusing on violent (including sexual) recidivism and sexual recidivism alone. Results for both frequency and type of pornography use were generally consistent with our predictions.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs ... 2/ab.20250

No correlations were found between the number of videos a man had rented and his attitudes toward feminism and rape. These findings suggest that calloused attitudes toward women may not be generated by sexually explicit videos but are more deeply ingrained in our society.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/3813560?se ... b_contents

Si me quitan el porno, me hago de Vox.

[¿Quien es este tipo?]

Si me quitan el porno, me hago de Vox.

Pero pero pero pero... ¿No estabas casado? Con una mujer desnuda quiero decir.

¿Para qué cojones quieres ver porno pudiendo protagonizarlo?

Compra juguetes, vete a sitios...

¿Ver porno en lugar de follar? No jodas -lol-.

[M. Corleone]

Si me quitan el porno, me hago de Vox.

Pero pero pero pero... ¿No estabas casado? Con una mujer desnuda quiero decir.

¿Para qué cojones quieres ver porno pudiendo protagonizarlo?

Compra juguetes, vete a sitios...

¿Ver porno en lugar de follar? No jodas -lol-.

Ya si eso otro día te lo explico.

[¿Quien es este tipo?]

Ya si eso otro día te lo explico.

¿Con pelos y señales?

[rianxeira]

Beforeigners

De repente en el mundo empiezan a salir del mar entes de otras épocas, y a vivir entre nosotros. 5 años después de la primera llegada a Oslo aparece asesinada una mujer prehistórica que acaba de llegar y le encargan la investigación a un policía a media jornada y a una novata en su primer día, que resulta ser una Skjaldmö vikinga. La sería tiene una factura que recuerda mucho a las americanas, especialmente los títulos de crédito con los protagonistas recorriendo la ciudad viendo a los "inmigrantes" con una canción muy americana de fondo. De hecho me recuerda mucho a otra intro pero no caigo en cual es. De momento está bien, y no hay que ser muy avispado para ver el paralelismo con la inmigración.

[Chino Moreno]

Vista. Curiosamente, estoy de acuerdo en casi todo lo que dices, pero el que hubiera un caso concreto (pese a todos los fallos, cosas absurdas e insultos a la inteligencia del espectador que mencionas, que comparto contigo, excepto que el rollo-bollo, pese a estar metido con calzador, sí que me ha resultado estimulante) a mí me ha hecho la serie más entretenida y adictiva. Y claro, como yo a la primera le daría un 7 (ni de coña me pareció "Zodiac" hecha serie, porque Zodiac para mí es un 9,25) a esta segunda temporada le doy un 7,5.

El actor que interpreta al agente veterano me gusta, y el personaje también (más allá de la ridícula trama secundaria que le han calzado esta temporada).

De la mitad en adelante se echan de menos más entrevistas con criminales, ciertamente.

La novieta bartender era atractiva hasta el desmayo.

Ojo, que a mí el rollo bollo no me molesta en sí por ser lesbianas, me molesta porque, si te paras a analizarlo, el personaje de la jefa, en esta temporada, no sirve absolutamente para nada.

La T2 va de los asesinatos de Atlanta, y de cómo la unidad de Ciencias del Comportamiento pone en práctica las teorías que trazaron en la T1. Y en esa trama, ni la jefa ni el tercer miembro del equipo (de cuyo nombre no quiero acordarme, ni me interesa lo más mínimo), pintan absolutamente nada.

Si te bajaras la T2 y cortaras con un editor TODAS las escenas de la jefa, las que tratan de su vida personal que me importa tres pimientos, e incluso las que tratan de entrevistas a asesinos (que para mi gusto, nada tienen que ver con las que hacen sus dos colegas), te queda una historia exactamente igual que la temporada completa.

Comprendería que a un personaje con peso en la trama se le intentara dar una profundidad con una historia secundaria que le aportara algo y le enriqueciera, el problema es cuando ese personaje solo tiene historia secundaria, y ningún peso ni influencia en la principal, que es lo que le pasa a la jefa.

Y sobre el caso que investigan, yo sigo pensando que me hubiera gustado más un caso menos mediático y grande, algo más pequeño, más íntimo, en el que se investigaran pistas propias del asesinato, y no tanto una maraña de políticos, periodistas y cuerpos de seguridad...